Discover AI Usage Across the Organization
We uncover how AI is being used across your organization, including Copilot, private GPTs, and embedded AI tools. This establishes a clear baseline of where risk exists.
AI is accelerating faster than governance, security, and compliance can keep up. AI & Data Security & Compliance services help you identify where AI is being used, what data it touches, and how to safely scale adoption without introducing unmanaged risk.
AI risk and exposure visibility
Data-first security controls
Governance aligned to frameworks
Continuous AI risk oversight
Blue Mantis helps organizations assess AI risk, establish governance, secure data, and maintain ongoing oversight as AI adoption grows.
Blue Mantis evaluates how AI is being used across your organization and identifies risk across identity, data, access, and model behavior. We provide a clear starting point for safe AI adoption.
Blue Mantis helps organizations establish an AI Governance Office — the structure, charter, and operating model that ensures AI adoption happens within defined, enforceable boundaries instead of unmanaged risk.
Blue Mantis focuses on protecting the data that powers AI systems, extending data loss prevention to prompts, agent outputs, and browser-based LLM usage — not just traditional file and email channels.
Blue Mantis ensures AI usage aligns with regulatory requirements and emerging standards. We reduce compliance risk while enabling responsible AI adoption.
Blue Mantis provides continuous oversight of AI systems, ensuring risk is detected early and controls remain effective as AI usage grows.
We uncover how AI is being used across your organization, including Copilot, private GPTs, and embedded AI tools. This establishes a clear baseline of where risk exists.
AI systems are evaluated across identity, data, access, and model behavior. This identifies gaps in data protection, governance structure, and oversight that increase exposure.
Governance frameworks, data security controls, and access policies are designed and implemented to align AI usage with business risk and compliance requirements. This ensures AI adoption is structured, not ad hoc.
Ongoing monitoring tracks AI behavior, data exposure, and compliance alignment. This keeps controls effective as AI usage grows and requirements evolve.
AI introduces new attack surfaces tied to data access, model behavior, and automation. Risks include unintended data exposure, misuse, and decision-making impacts that traditional controls are not designed to address.
Most gaps are in visibility and governance. Organizations often do not know where AI is being used, what data is being accessed, or how decisions are being made within AI systems.
AI governance extends beyond policy into model behavior, data interaction, and continuous monitoring. It requires oversight across technical teams, legal, and business stakeholders.
AI systems rely on data to function, making data the primary risk vector. Without proper controls, sensitive information can be exposed or misused through AI interactions.
AI risk should be continuously monitored and periodically reassessed as new use cases, models, and integrations are introduced. AI environments evolve quickly, and controls must keep pace.
We will identify where AI is being used, what data it touches, and where governance and controls may be missing. You leave with a clear roadmap to reduce risk and move forward with confidence.
A field briefing on AI-powered threats, shadow AI governance, and what a practical defense looks like in 2026.
Hybrid workforces, cloud environments, and mobile devices create an expanding attack surface that internal teams struggle to monitor objectively. Reactive securityis no longer enough.
This is not alarmism. It is a description of a gap that is now quantifiable, sourced, and closing in the wrong direction.
| State | Types of Residents To Whom The Law Applies | Exceptions For Employment-Related Information |
| Colorado | An individual who is a Colorado resident acting only in an individual or household context and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context, as a job applicant, or as a beneficiary of someone acting in an employment context. | Data maintained for employment records purposes. |
| Connecticut | An individual who is a resident of Connecticut and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context or as an employee, owner, director, officer or contractor of a company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit or government agency whose communications or transactions with us occur solely within the context of that individual’s role with the company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit or government agency. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
| Montana | An individual who is a resident of Montana and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context or as an employee, owner, director, officer, or contractor of a company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit, or government agency whose communications or transactions with the controller occur solely within the context of that individual’s role with the company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit, or government agency. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
| Oregon | A natural person who resides in Oregon and acts in any capacity other than in a commercial or employment context. | Information processed or maintained solely in connection with, and for the purpose of, enabling an individual’s employment or application for employment; an individual’s ownership of, or function as a director or officer of, a business entity; or an individual’s contractual relationship with a business entity. |
| Texas | An individual who is a resident of Texas acting only in an individual or household context and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
| Utah | An individual who is a resident of Utah acting in an individual or household context and does not include an individual acting in an employment or commercial context. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent the collection and use of the data are related to the individual’s role. |
| Virginia | A natural person who is a resident of Virginia acting only in an individual or household context and does not include a natural person acting in a commercial or employment context. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
This information is provided only to offer further context to our privacy disclosures and for informational purposes. You should not rely upon this information in making a decision that could have a legal or similarly significant effect on you or anyone else.