Define Attack Scope
We align testing to your environment, business priorities, and risk profile. This ensures scenarios reflect how attackers would realistically target your organization.
Most security programs rely on controls working as designed, but attackers do not follow those assumptions. Offensive Security services simulate real-world attack paths across infrastructure, identity, applications, and people, so you can understand where risk actually exists and how it could impact the business.
Real-world attack simulation
Identity and access focus
Business-impact driven findings
Prioritized remediation guidance
Blue Mantis delivers offensive security testing spaning infrastructure, applications, identity, people, and emerging AI-driven threats.
Blue Mantis simulates real-world attacks against internal and external environments, including wireless and physical access points, to identify exploitable vulnerabilities. Testing follows the Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES), an industry-recognized methodology that validates how attackers could gain access, escalate privileges, and move across systems.
Blue Mantis tests how attackers exploit trust, behavior, and identity using phishing, impersonation, and AI-driven deepfake techniques. We focus on human risk, where traditional controls are least effective.
Blue Mantis identifies vulnerabilities in web applications, mobile apps, and APIs by simulating real attack techniques. We focus on how attackers interact with applications and the business impact of exploitation.
Blue Mantis tests how attackers exploit modern cloud environments, AI-driven systems, and identity infrastructure. We focus on attack paths across permissions, credentials, and integrated workflows that lead to real business impact.
We align testing to your environment, business priorities, and risk profile. This ensures scenarios reflect how attackers would realistically target your organization.
Offensive testing replicates real-world adversary techniques across network, identity, applications, and users. This exposes vulnerabilities that automated scans and controls often miss.
Findings are validated through real attack paths, showing how vulnerabilities could lead to data exposure, privilege escalation, or operational disruption. This connects technical gaps to business risk.
Receive prioritized recommendations and a clear roadmap to close exposure gaps. This ensures teams focus on the vulnerabilities that matter most, not just the most visible.
Vulnerability scans identify known issues but do not validate how those issues can be exploited. Offensive security simulates real attacks, showing how vulnerabilities can be chained together and what impact they could have on your business. This provides a more realistic view of risk.
Most organizations perform testing annually or after major changes, such as new applications, infrastructure updates, or cloud migrations. Regular testing ensures new vulnerabilities and attack paths are identified before they are exploited.
Red team operations simulate attackers trying to breach your environment without detection. Purple team engagements combine offensive and defensive teams to improve detection, response, and coordination based on those simulated attacks.
Many successful attacks no longer rely on exploiting systems alone. Attackers frequently target users, credentials, and trust relationships, making identity and human behavior a critical part of the attack surface.
Testing is carefully planned and controlled to minimize disruption. Engagements are scoped to avoid critical impact while still simulating realistic attack scenarios. Any high-risk activities are coordinated in advance with your team.
We will simulate real attack scenarios across your infrastructure, identity, and applications to surface where exposure exists. You leave with a clear understanding of risk and a prioritized path to reduce it.
In this on-demand session, Randy Becker exposes how flaws are discovered, chained, and automated into real-world attacks.
We act as your frontline defense,
using hacker-like tactics to uncover hidden vulnerabilities across your network, systems, and cloud assets.
This is not alarmism. It is a description of a gap that is now quantifiable, sourced, and closing in the wrong direction.
| State | Types of Residents To Whom The Law Applies | Exceptions For Employment-Related Information |
| Colorado | An individual who is a Colorado resident acting only in an individual or household context and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context, as a job applicant, or as a beneficiary of someone acting in an employment context. | Data maintained for employment records purposes. |
| Connecticut | An individual who is a resident of Connecticut and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context or as an employee, owner, director, officer or contractor of a company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit or government agency whose communications or transactions with us occur solely within the context of that individual’s role with the company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit or government agency. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
| Montana | An individual who is a resident of Montana and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context or as an employee, owner, director, officer, or contractor of a company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit, or government agency whose communications or transactions with the controller occur solely within the context of that individual’s role with the company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit, or government agency. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
| Oregon | A natural person who resides in Oregon and acts in any capacity other than in a commercial or employment context. | Information processed or maintained solely in connection with, and for the purpose of, enabling an individual’s employment or application for employment; an individual’s ownership of, or function as a director or officer of, a business entity; or an individual’s contractual relationship with a business entity. |
| Texas | An individual who is a resident of Texas acting only in an individual or household context and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
| Utah | An individual who is a resident of Utah acting in an individual or household context and does not include an individual acting in an employment or commercial context. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent the collection and use of the data are related to the individual’s role. |
| Virginia | A natural person who is a resident of Virginia acting only in an individual or household context and does not include a natural person acting in a commercial or employment context. | Data processed or maintained in the course of an individual applying to, being employed by, or acting as an agent or independent contractor, to the extent that the data is collected and used within the context of that role. |
This information is provided only to offer further context to our privacy disclosures and for informational purposes. You should not rely upon this information in making a decision that could have a legal or similarly significant effect on you or anyone else.